Legal Opinion
McClung v. Schulte
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 10, 1958No. 20166PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
Surveys or plats made pursuant to the requirements of Code § 23-1112 are presumptive evidence of the facts set out therein. In the present case it is conceded that the plat in question (plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 5) did not meet the requirements of this section of the Code. It is contended, however, that the plat was verified by the testimony of T. A. McClung, and that it was, therefore, admissible as illustrative of the oral testimony of this witness. It is true that unofficial surveys are admissible when proved to be correct. Bunger v. Grimm, 142 Ga. 448, 449 (5) (83 S. E. 200,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bunger v. GrimmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Durden v. KerbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Mickle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Williams v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Rucker v. RuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- R. G. Foster & Co. v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Harbor Co. v. CopelanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Ware v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999