Hollister v. Government Employees Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.
This is an action to recover under a contract of insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff Paul E. Hollister for hospital and medical services rendered to his wife. Judgment was entered for plaintiffs and we affirm that judgment.
Plaintiff Paul Hollister was on active duty with the United States Army and, as such, was entitled to have medical expenses incurred in behalf of his dependents, in other than government hospitals, paid by the United States in accordance with the provisions of Title 10, U.S.C.A., chapter 55, sections 1071 et seq. The medical expense amounted to $2,199. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Kopp v. Home Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- American Indemnity Company v. OlesijukCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Thomas v. Universal Life Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Irby v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ortiz Alvarado v. Great American Life Assurance Co. PRSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
- Malerbi v. Central Reserve Life of North America InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Winter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Samsel v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.