Legal Opinion
United Shoe MacHinery Corporation v. EH Ferree Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 3, 1933No. 321PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellant sues on claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the Morgan patent, No. 1,629,870, for an improvement on a clicking machine used in tho manufacture of shoe uppers. This machine is used for cutting leather or a plurality of plies of fabric. It has a die bed to support the stock and a laterally swinging’ hammer arm, supported at one end on a post and manually movable into position over a steel cutting die placed on the stock. When the operator has swung the arm into position over the die, he operates a tripping mechanism as a result of which the hammer arm is driven onto the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hicks v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- George Frost Co. v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Griffith Rubber Mills, a Corporation v. Henry S. HoffarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Gasoline Products Co., Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Kelley v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.