Legal Opinion
Pomerantz v. Microsoft Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 2002No. 01CA0458PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
Plaintiff, Benjamin J. Pomerantz, M.D., appeals the judgment dismissing his complaint against defendant, Microsoft Corporation, for violation of the Colorado Antitrust Act of 1992, § 64-101, et seq., CRS. 2001(Act), by allegedly overcharging for its Windows 98 operating system. We affirm. on 3(E)(1) (1990) (commentary states, "Rule of necessity may override the rule of disqualification.").
I. Facts and Procedural History
Microsoft is a corporation, organized under the laws of the state of Washington, that primarily focuses on developing and licensing computer software.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation. Appeals of Robert A. HugginsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Elkins v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- A & M SUPPLY CO. v. Microsoft Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Major v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.