Legal Opinion

Sumrall v. Sumrall

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided April 15, 1852PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On appeal from the probate court of Clarke county. The facts of the case are contained in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yerger

The plaintiffs in error presented their account as administrators, &c., of Moses Sumrall, deceased, for final settlement. Exceptions were taken to several items of the account, and the exceptions were sustained as to two items, and overruled as to the remainder. The items to which exceptions were sustained, were two credits claimed; one for “ $500, paid R. A. Sumrall’s *259account,” and the other for “ $50, for contingent expenses which may occur.” It is said the court erred in rejecting the credit of $500. No objection is taken to the rejection of the $50 item.

On the first day of May, 1848,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Frei v. BrownleeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Feld v. BorodofskiMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Langston v. CanterburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. Boyd v. ApplewhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Moss v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API