McCullough-Dalzell Crucible Co. v. Philadelphia Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 160, Oct. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1907, No. 281, dismissing bill in equity in case of McCulloughDalzell Crucible Company v. Philadephia Company. Bill in equity for an injunction.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 160, Oct. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1907, No. 281, dismissing bill in equity in case of McCulloughDalzell Crucible Company v. Philadephia Company. Bill in equity for an injunction. Miller, J., specially presiding, filed the following opinion: The" bill alleges, that the plaintiff granted the defendant the right to lay and maintain pipe lines in the bed of Thirty-sixth street and Spruce alley in the city of Pittsburg, title to which the plaintiff claims; in consideration for which the defendant had agreed to furnish gas as fuel to…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant on the findings and opinion of Judge Miller, specially presiding.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Dover Copper Mining Co. v. DoengesArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Bastian v. Marienville Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Hess v. Iowa Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Faught v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.