Legal Opinion

State v. Clanton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1998No. 96-212; CA A94254PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The state appeals a judgment imposing a probationary sentence on two felony convictions that are subject to mandatory minimum 75-month sentences under ORS 137.700(2)(p). The trial court declined to impose the mandatory minimum sentences on the ground that the statute is facially unconstitutional. The state argues that, in the light of the Supreme Court’s decision in State ex rel Huddleston v. Sawyer, 324 Or 597, 932 P2d 1145, cert den 118 S Ct 557 (1997), the case must be remanded for resentencing under ORS 137.700(2)(p).

At the outset, we must address whether the state’s appeal is reviewable.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JackmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. GeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API