Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Shaw
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 1916No. 7630PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Original application by Fred G. Shaw for writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
The charter of the city of Tulsa (article 2, sec. 3, par. 30) grants power to the city to “regulate the use of automobiles, * * * and the speed thereof, * * * to issue permits for the use of such vehicles and to require the numbering of said vehicles.”
On August 29, 1915, petitioner was arrested, charged with driving an automobile on the streets of said city in violation of Ordinance No. 1165, as amended by Ordinance No. 1250, the pertinent part of which reads:
“Section 1. That it shall be and is unlawful for any person * * * to use or operate upon any public street * * * of the city of Tulsa *…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Gross Production Tax of Wolverine Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Matter of Application of SchulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Kalich v. KnappOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- McGannon, Admx. v. State Ex Rel. TrappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Payne v. MasseyTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Pawnee County, Excise Board v. KurnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- City of Ardmore v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.