Legal Opinion

Secord v. Northwestern Tire Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 1924No. 23,999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action in conversion. There were findings for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

On November 27, 1920, Anton Broms and others mortgaged the property, of which conversion is claimed, to the plaintiff. After-wards Broms and his associates sold to the defendant. The defendant took possession. 'There was a default in the mortgage. The plaintiff demanded possession. It was refused. If the mortgage was valid as against the defendant the plaintiff was entitled to possession and there was a conversion; otherwise there was not.

Broms and his associates at the time of the execution…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pabst Brewing Co. v. ButchartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leonczak v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. In re FreyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1926
  3. Drew v. FeuerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Hanson v. Citizens State Bank of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. In re De Luxe Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API