Legal Opinion

People for the Ethical Operation of Prosecutors etc. v. Spitzer

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 2020No. G057546MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/8/20 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL OPERATION OF PROSECUTORS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT et al., G057546 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2018-00983799) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT TODD SPITZER, as District Attorney, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents. It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 12, 2020, be modified as follows: On page 4, first full paragraph, delete the second sentence which reads: “To…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API