Legal Opinion
Zahr v. Wingate Creek Acquisition Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 1993No. 91 Civ. 6871 (DNE)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Sameer Y. Zahr (“Zahr”) brings this action to enforce an alleged agreement between Zahr and defendants. Pursuant to this alleged agreement, plaintiff would receive approximately 44% of the outstanding shares of stock in Wingate Creek Acquisition Corp. (“Wingate”) in exchange for his efforts on behalf of Wingate or as a result of the successful consummation of a joint venture agreement between plaintiff and Erol Y. Beker (“Beker”). Defendants move for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Zahr…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Serdaroglu v. SerdarogluAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994