State v. Shirley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Judge.
This appeal raises the question of whether the exclusionary rule, invoked to suppress evidence of an illegal search, should be applied to a probation revocation hearing when the police officers who conducted the search were aware of the defendant’s status as a probationer. We agree with the trial court that it should in this instance.
On April 28, 1975, appellee Michael Shirley pled guilty to the crime of second degree burglary. Imposition of sentence was suspended and appellee was placed on probation.
In the early morning hours of May 3, 1976, officers from the Federal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AlfaroArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. OlsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- State v. BurkholderOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- State v. TowleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.