Legal Opinion
De Marco v. Paramount Ice Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
Plaintiff here seeks judgment declaring void the voting trust agreement dated April 21, 1948 and executed by and between the 21 individual defendants, as stockholders and as voting trustees. Incidental injunctive relief is also prayed for.
The action was commenced in May, 1949. The validity of the voting trust is attacked in the complaint on the ground that a copy thereof was not filed in the office of the corporate defendant and that the contents thereof were kept secret, so that plaintiff, an owner of 220 shares of the common stock (the only class of stock permitted to vote) was not afforded…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Claim of Schmidt v. Wolf Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- McQuade v. StonehamNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- R. H. Sanders Corp. v. HavesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Schneiderman v. KahalnikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Keystone Life InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Dal-Tran Service Co. v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.