Legal Opinion

Labozetta v. District Court of Polk County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The only contention of the petitioner is that it must be shown that he was either served with the order of injunction or a copy, or had knowledge or notice of the granting of the injunction.

On October 3, 1924, the defendant was served with an original notice, stating that there was then on file a petition asking, among other things, that defendant be enjoined from continuing the nuisance specified, by selling, dispensing, or keeping for sale any intoxicating liquor, in violation of law, on the prem ises named, “or at any other place in the state of Iowa.’’ The petition on file alleged that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Ayres v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. Phillips v. GermonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Harris v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. State v. McCoyWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. State Ex Rel. SnowWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Benscoter v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Friend v. CummingsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API