Legal Opinion

People v. Figueroa

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 2017No. H043204PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

—A criminal defendant and the People have the right to have a preliminary examination (or, preliminary hearing) set “at the earliest possible time.” (Pen. Code, § 859b.) And as part of the statutory scheme ensuring a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial, “[t]he magistrate shall dismiss the complaint if the preliminary examination is set or continued more than 60 days from the date of the arraignment, plea, or reinstatement of criminal proceedings [after a doubt is declared as to the defendant’s competence], unless the defendant personally waives [that]…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. Superior Court of Solano Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Molina v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. (HC) Moreno v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Favor v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API