People v. Figueroa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
—A criminal defendant and the People have the right to have a preliminary examination (or, preliminary hearing) set “at the earliest possible time.” (Pen. Code, § 859b.) And as part of the statutory scheme ensuring a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial, “[t]he magistrate shall dismiss the complaint if the preliminary examination is set or continued more than 60 days from the date of the arraignment, plea, or reinstatement of criminal proceedings [after a doubt is declared as to the defendant’s competence], unless the defendant personally waives [that]…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. Superior Court of Solano Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Molina v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (HC) Moreno v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Favor v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.