Legal Opinion

United States v. Fausto Dejesus

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 12, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Fausto Dejesus appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jed S. Rakoff, Judge) entered August 11, 1999, convicting him, following a guilty plea, of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and sentencing him principally to imprisonment for 120 months. He maintains that the plea agreement, which included a waiver of his right to appeal any sentence imposed within an agreed-upon range under the Sentencing Guidelines, is invalid because (1) the plea proceeding under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 1 did not adequately…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Julio Salcido-ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Prisco v. A & D Carting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Danilo HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Jason Cox (A/k/a "Jc") and Clinton Cox, Willie GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Derrick Smythe, Also Known as "D,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. ErazoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  5. Horton v. ErcoleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API