Legal Opinion
United States v. Julio Salcido-Contreras
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 31, 1993No. 935, Docket 92-1404PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal concerns the enforceability of an agreement not to appeal from a sentence which falls within an agreed range. On January 31, 1992, Julio Salcido-Contrer-ás pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and § 841(b)(1)(B). In the plea agreement, Salcido explicitly waived his right to appeal a sentence falling within a stipulated range of 78 to 97 months. On June 19, 1992, the district court (Patterson, J.) sentenced Salcido to 96 months in prison, a four year supervised release term, and imposed a mandatory $50 special…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Domingo RexachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Thomas Palermo and Sheldon Saltzman v. Warden, Green Haven State Prison, and Russell OswaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Robert Maher, AKA "Bob M.", Peter Mancusi, Andrew GiordanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gomez-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.