Legal Opinion

Letres v. Washington Co-Operative Chick Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1941No. 28128PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover a money judgment. To the complaint a demurrer was interposed, and also a motion to strike. The demurrer was overruled, and the motion was, in part, granted. An amended complaint was filed, to which there was no demurrer. The answer denied liability and pleaded two affirmative defenses. The trial was to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $850.23. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and also for a new trial, both of which motions were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Germain v. Potlatch Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hill v. Great Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Prentice Packing & Storage Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hausken v. Hodson-Feenaughty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Stanley Drug Co. v. Smith, Kline & French LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. McClellanWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ambrose v. HackertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Cambro Co. v. SnookWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Morango v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cloakey v. BouslogWashington Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API