State ex rel. Clark v. City of Toledo
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWolff, J.
The narrow question presented by this appeal is whether a criminal defendant who has exhausted the direct appeals of his conviction may avail himself of R.C. 149.43 to support his petition for post-conviction relief. We answer this question in the affirmative, and accordingly we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this case to that court for an individualized scrutiny of those records which respondents contend that Clark, pursuant to R.C. 149.43(A)(2)(C) and (A)(4), is not entitled to inspect and copy.
In support of the judgment of the court of appeals, respondents contend…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by33 opinions
- John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Fant v. EnrightOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Zuern v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Williams v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.