Legal Opinion

Middleborough Horizontal Property Regime Council of Co-Owners v. Montedison S.P.A.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 11, 1995No. 2429PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Respondent, Middleborough Horizontal Property Regime Council of Co-owners (the Regime), 1 instituted this action against appellants, Montedison S.p.A. and Montedison USA, Inc. (referred to collectively as Montedison) and others, for damages sustained as a result of defective roofing materials installed on the condominiums. The Regime alleged several causes of action including negligence, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, strict liability in tort, breach of warranty accompanied by fraudulent conduct, and violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act. Prior to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. GerngrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Beall v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Columbia East Associates v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dawkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. Clegg Ex Rel. Estate of CleggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Wade v. Berkeley CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Jackson v. Swordfish Investments, L.L.C.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Schmidt v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API