Oil-Well Supply Co. v. Priddy
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Jay Circuit Court; John M. Smith, Judge. Action by the Oil-Well Supply Company against Emerson Priddy. Prom a. judgment for plaintiff for less than its demand, it appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
This action was instituted by appellant against appellee to recover for goods and merchandise sold and delivered by appellant to appellee. The appellant was a retail dealer in oil-well supplies. The appellee was engaged in the *202business of producing oil. The account sued on was for oil-well supplies, and undenied by appellee. Among the goods and merchandise so sold and purchased was a certain drive-pipe, which appellee, by way of amended counterclaim in three paragraphs, alleged to be defective, and by reason of such defect he was damaged. Appellant’s separate demurrer to each paragraph of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- M. S. Huey Co. v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Oil-Well Supply Co. v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Hartwell Bros. v. William E. Peck & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Dowell v. JollyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
- Henry v. PrendergastIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Mortimer v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Markle v. StekollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.