Legal Opinion

Tulare Savings Bank v. Talbot

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1900No. Sac. No. 616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William H. Jordan, for Appellants A. P. Talbot and George A. Pope.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs and intervenors, judgment creditors of the Paekwood Vineyard and Fruit Company, an insolvent corporation, to compel payment by the stockholders of that corporation of the unpaid portion of their stock. The defendants Pope, Talbot, and Fagan appeal from the judgment given against them, and in support of their appeal Talbot and Pope urge that they were not original subscribers to the stock of the corporation, that they purchased their stock from the corporation under written contract and at the agreed price of fifty-six dollars per share, which they had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Burr v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. West v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turner v. Fidelity Loan ConcernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. Thomas v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. San Francisco Commercial Agency v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API