Legal Opinion
San Francisco Commercial Agency v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 1906No. Civ. No. 267PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
This is an action against certain stockholders of the Eureka Consolidated Oil Company to recover their proportionate share of the indebtedness of said corporation. The only question presented for decision involves the sufficiency of an allegation in the complaint which reads as follows:
“That the capital stock of said Eureka Consolidated Oil Company now is, and at all the times hereinafter mentioned was, the sum of Sixty Thousand Dollars, divided into 60,000 shares of the par value of One Dollar each; that at all said times there had been issued by said Company 37,735 shares of its capital…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- California Southern Hotel Co. v. CallenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bidwell v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Stanford v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blythe v. DohenyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Marcel CafeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931