Legal Opinion
State v. Keating
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided May 10, 1977No. 59437PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Judge.
Respondent’s application to transfer this cause from the Kansas City District of the Court of Appeals having been sustained, we consider the same “as on original appeal.” Mo.Const. Art. 5, Sec. 10.
Appellant, a lawyer, was indicted and convicted of possession of Phenmetrazine Hydrochloride, a Schedule II controlled substance, and his punishment was fixed by the jury at five years confinement. §§ 195.017, 195.020 and 195.200, RSMo Supp. 1973. We affirm.
Prior to the alleged offense, several law enforcement officers had been assigned to investigate drug traffic into the jail of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. David BuenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- United States v. Fred MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Paul Washington Kibby v. United States of America, Charles R. Stewart v. United States of America, Carl McFadden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HohenseeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Keating v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Keating v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.