Legal Opinion
Keating v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1980No. 80-1520PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Per curiam
Patrick Keating, pro se, appeals from the dismissal of an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All of Keating’s claims arise out of his state prosecution and conviction *1122for possession of a controlled substance.1 The district court dismissed Keating’s petition pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1), (6). We affirm.
Keating alleges that actions taken by members of the Jackson County Attorney’s office regarding his prosecution and the dismissal of charges against an informant, Sharon Pollard, violated his constitutional rights. It is also alleged that Assistant Jackson County Public Defender Henri…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ed Rich v. Larry C. DollarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Earl Edwin Gobel and Michael J. Defranco v. Maricopa County, Thomas E. Collins, David P. Stoller, and Frank GaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Robert F. Davis v. James Grusemeyer, Raymond Gurak, Donald Yingling, David v. Brody, and Charles E. WaldronCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Allen Dale Price v. Dan Moody, Prosecuting Attorney, Carter County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.