People v. Allen
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County, and from an order denying a new trial. Clarence A. Raker, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Defendant was informed against by the district attorney of Modoc County for the crime of unlawfully selling alcoholic liquors, to wit: “That on or about the twenty-ninth day of May, 1917, and before the filing of this information, at and in the county of Modoc, state of California, said Felix Allen then and there, within the incorporated limits of the town of Alturas, in said county, which was then and there no-license territory, willfully and unlawfully did sell and furnish alcoholic liquor, to wit: whisky, to one Lulu Sisson,” contrary, etc. The cause was tried before a jury and defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Commonwealth v. HolstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- People v. MonteithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. PeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Rosenthal, Feder, & Co. v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SibertUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Triad Data Services, Inc. v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. BickerstaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.