Legal Opinion

Actian Corporation v. SS&C Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 22, 2025No. 4:24-cv-05064Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ACTIAN CORPORATION, Case No. 24-cv-05064-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 25 10 SS&C TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant SS&C Technologies, Inc.’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. 14 No. 25. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the 15 matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court 16 GRANTS the motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 As relevant to the pending…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Pebble Beach Company, a California General Partnership v. Michael Caddy, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API