Actian Corporation v. SS&C Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ACTIAN CORPORATION, Case No. 24-cv-05064-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 25 10 SS&C TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant SS&C Technologies, Inc.’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. 14 No. 25. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the 15 matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court 16 GRANTS the motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 As relevant to the pending…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Pebble Beach Company, a California General Partnership v. Michael Caddy, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.