Legal Opinion

Trio Process Corp. v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 23, 1976No. Nos. 75-1556, 75-1557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

In May 1972, this Court determined that United States Patent No. 3,076,421, owned by Trio Process Corporation (Trio), is a valid patent, that it had been willfully infringed by L. Goldstein’s Sons, Incorporated (Goldstein),1 and that the case should be remanded to the district court for a determination of damages.2 The question posed by the present appeal is whether the district court on the remand erred in assessing the damages.

I

The patented process which undergirds this controversy is a technique for salvaging copper from scrap wire by the use of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Marysanta Digregory Bigony v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Ray Carr Tires, Inc. Friend's Tire and Fleet Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
Trio Process Corporation, in 75-1556, and Franklin Smelting & Refining Co., a Partnership v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc. And Metal Bank, Inc. Trio Process Corporation and Franklin Smelting & Refining Co., a Partnership v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc. And Metal Bank, Inc., in 75-1557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976