Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Brett v. Four (4) Bell Fruit Gum Slot MacHines
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 9, 1945No. 31872PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford Brett, county attorney of Carter county, Okla., appeals to this court from an order of the district court of Carter county refusing to forfeit Four (4) Bell Fruit Gum slot machines seized by the sheriff of that county from certain persons in charge of the Commissioned Officers Club and Mess Club rooms in Ardmore, Okla.
The proceedings for the forfeiture of these slot machines was brought under 21 O.S. 1941 § 964 et seq. It was admitted at the trial that the devices seized were slot machines within the definition of section 964, supra. It likewise was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Dorrell v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Neville v. MullenMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Moore v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- State of Arizona v. Gambling EquipmentArizona Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Mims Amusement Co. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. Merchandise SeizedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Dugger v. Twelve Thousand DollarsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.