Paul Muller Industrie GmbH & Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
Introduction
Timken U.S. Corporation (“Timken”) moves for reconsideration of the court’s decision in Paul Muller Industrie GmbH & Co. v. United States, 435 F.Supp.2d 1241, 1245-47 (CIT 2006), that Commerce properly adjusted U.S. indirect selling expenses for an amount reflecting currency exchange gains on transactions between the U.S. affiliate and the parent company. Timken U.S. Corporation’s Motion for Reconsideration (“Timken’s Motion”) at 1. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (2004).
II
Background
In Paul Muller Industrie GmbH & Co. v. United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- North American Foreign Trading Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Richard Nelson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Starkey Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fuji America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006