Legal Opinion

ITT Telecom Products Corp. v. Dooley

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1989No. H003501PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*311Opinion

AGLIANO, P. J.

1. Introduction

Does the statutory privilege for statements made in judicial proceedings (Civ. Code, § 47, subd. 2) preclude liability for an otherwise wrongful disclosure of trade secrets? Plaintiff ITT Telecom Products Corporation (ITT) filed the instant suit for damages alleging its former employee, defendant Gerald F. Dooley, had violated contractual and other duties of confidentiality. Dooley moved for summary judgment or summary adjudication based on the privilege, asserting his disclosures were made as a consultant to a party involved in litigation with ITT. The…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Snepp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ITT Telecom Products Corp. v. DooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API