Legal Opinion
Arneson v. Fox
California Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1980No. L.A. 31259Published
1Opinion of the Court
28 Cal.3d 440 (1980)
621 P.2d 817
170 Cal. Rptr. 778
RICHARD WENDELL ARNESON, JR., Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
DAVID H. FOX, as Real Estate Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Respondent.
Docket No. L.A. 31259.
Supreme Court of California.
December 1, 1980.
COUNSEL
Seltzer Caplan Wilkins & McMahon, Jeffrey L. Mason and Dennis J. Wickham for Plaintiff and Appellant.
George Deukmejian, Attorney General, Arthur C. de Goede, Assistant Attorney General, and Edmond B. Mamer, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
RICHARDSON, J.
What are the administrative consequences to a real estate…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.