Legal Opinion

Salentine & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 18, 1971No. 5410, C.A.D. 1031PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from tbe judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, 64 Cust. Ct. 213, C.D. 3982 (1970), overruling a protest against the classification of “carry-over mechanisms” under TSUS 720.16 as “Other clock movements” valued at over $5 but not over $10 each. We affirm.

THE MERCHANDISE

The carry-over mechanisms are spring-powered devices for incorporation 'into electrical time switches to keep them on schedule for up to ten hours in the event of a temporary power failure. Time switches are mechanisms used to make or break electrical circuits automatically at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Salentine & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ditbro Pearl Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  2. Hermle Black Forest Clocks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API