Salentine & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, Judge.
This appeal is from tbe judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, 64 Cust. Ct. 213, C.D. 3982 (1970), overruling a protest against the classification of “carry-over mechanisms” under TSUS 720.16 as “Other clock movements” valued at over $5 but not over $10 each. We affirm.
THE MERCHANDISE
The carry-over mechanisms are spring-powered devices for incorporation 'into electrical time switches to keep them on schedule for up to ten hours in the event of a temporary power failure. Time switches are mechanisms used to make or break electrical circuits automatically at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salentine & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ditbro Pearl Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Hermle Black Forest Clocks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990