Legal Opinion
Judi Simek, and Scott Everett v. Christopher Nolan d/b/a Lakeside Farm, LLC, and William P. McCall, III
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 2016No. 10A01-1603-CT-412PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRONE, Judge.
Case Summary
[1] Judi Simek brings an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of her motion to reconsider its previous denial of her motion to dismiss the claims filed against her by Christopher Nolan d/b/a Lakeside Farm, LLC, and William P. McCall, III (collectively “the Plaintiffs”). Specifically, Simek asserts that dismissal is warranted pursuant to Indiana Rule of Trial Procedure 12(B)(2) because the trial court lacks personal jurisdiction over her. We agree and therefore reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ claims…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Professional Billing, Inc. v. Zotec Partners, LLC, and Medical Management Professionals, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- City of Madison, Indiana v. William L. Demaree and Betty K. DemareeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Daniel T. O'Bryant, D.B.A. O'Bryant Transport LLC v. Alan P. Adams, Luan Adams, D.B.A., A.L.A. Trucking, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Aquatherm GmbH v. Renaissance Associates I Limited PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Baylor Intermodal, Inc. v. Chris Hood, Clay Daniel Walton & Adams PLC, and Fast Trak Investment Company, Inc. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.