Legal Opinion
Noble County v. Cross
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 16, 1991No. 75899PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANSEN, Judge:
Petitioners, Noble County (County), and State Insurance Fund (Fund), seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court, sitting as a three judge panel. The order affirmed the trial court’s finding that Respondent (Cross) sustained a change in physical condition for the worse, leaving him totally and permanently disabled. We sustain the panel’s order.
In January 1988, Cross was determined to have sustained 75% permanent partial disability as the result of an October 1983, injury to his heart, arising out of and in the course of his employment with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Bostick Tank Truck Service v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Federal Corp. v. Independent School District No. 13Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Western States Construction Company v. StaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Enochs v. Martin Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Smith v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Spirit Aerosystems v. McMillenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008