Tucker Industrial Liquid Coatings, Inc. v. Borough of East Berlin
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge.
This matter is before this Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Richards, Clayton, Woodward, and Phillips, protesting Plaintiffs equal protection claim. For the reasons articulated herein, the Court shall grant the Motion.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
By way of introduction, the equal protection challenge filed by Tucker Industri*805al Liquid Coatings (“Tucker”) largely focuses on Defendants’ actions in seeking to enforce a use provision of a zoning ordinance. However, this dispute cannot be viewed in isolation, and both parties detail…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garanin v. City of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- LATTANZO v. DUNBAR TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- LAYMAN v. DUNBAR TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ROHEILA v. MCKEESPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- SAVE OUR SALTSBURG SCHOOLS v. BLAIRSVILLE-SALTSBURG SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021