Legal Opinion

John v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Upon the theory that a demurrer to a counterclaim opens the record and raises the sufficiency in law of any prior pleading, the defendant seeks to attack the complaint upon the ground that, by reason of the failure of the plaintiffs to allege compliance with the statute regulating voluntary assignments, the instrument under which they took title is void and therefore of no effect.

At common law the rule was that a demurrer to a pleading opened the record and raised the sufficiency in law of all prior pleadings. Lame v. Hyde, 39 Wis. 345, and cases cited. The *592basis of the rule at common law was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fulton County Gas & Electric Co. v. Hudson River Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Lawe v. HydeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Hull v. . HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Anderson Building, Loan Fund & Savings Ass'n v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hart v. GodkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wesolowski v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Banking Commission v. BitkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Madison v. MaxwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API