Legal Opinion

Bourassa v. Keene

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 6, 1967No. 5583PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The question raised in this case is whether a party can appeal the decision of a board of adjustment to the Superior Court without first applying for a rehearing before the board. RSA 31:74 in pertinent part reads as follows: “Motion for rehearing. Within twenty days after any order or decision of the board of adjustment . . . any party to the action or proceedings, or any person directly affected, thereby, may apply for a rehearing in respect to any matter determined in the action or proceeding, or covered or included in the order, specifying in the motion for rehearing the ground therefor,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pascale v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Metzger v. Town of BrentwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. Carter v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. V.S.H. Realty, Inc. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Hardiman v. DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  5. Shaw v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API