Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Celanese Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 28, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 353 (1954)
104 A.2d 720
HAROLD HENDERSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
CELANESE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 8, 1954.
Decided April 28, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.
Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. Stanley U. Phares, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.
The issue in this appeal is whether the resulting injury of an…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luvaul v. A. Ray Barker Motor CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- George v. Great Eastern Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Henderson v. Celanese Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- In re the Liquidation of Sussex Mutual InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Torres Rivera v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.