Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Celanese Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 11, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. 208 (1954)
108 A.2d 267
HAROLD HENDERSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
CELANESE CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 20, 1954.
Decided October 11, 1954.
Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stanley U. Phares, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.
The authorities are divided upon the problem submitted, and the reasoning employed in the different schools of thought is as conflicting as the divergent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Seiken v. Todd Dry Dock, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Claim of Andrews v. L. & S. Amusement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dudley v. Victor Lynn Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- George v. Great Eastern Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Bowen v. OleskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Cierpial v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954