Legal Opinion

Mimick v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1991No. Nos. 91-1695, 91-1696PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Senior District Judge.

The United States appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska denying enforcement of three administrative summonses. We are called upon to determine whether the copies of the summonses issued to the taxpayers satisfy the requirement that an “attested copy” be served pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7603 (1988).

I

Taxpayers, Thomas and Michele Mimick, are husband and wife residing in North Platte, Nebraska. As the result of an audit of taxpayers’ 1986 and 1987 income tax *231returns, Special Agent Mark Kula of the Internal Revenue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winter v. Casco Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. United States v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Henderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1991
  4. United States v. Gilbert C. Swanson Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. DeramoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. John H. Fortney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. John E. Codner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. MARY A. ROBERT, — SIEGEL-ROBERT, INTERVENOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API