Legal Opinion

Mayr v. Mayr

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1911No. L.A. No. 2542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This appeal, founded on the judgment-roll alone, is taken by defendant as cross-complainant from a judgment denying a divorce to him. As a part of the judgment plaintiff and cross-defendant was awarded one hundred and fifty dollars a month for the support of herself and her minor child, although she also was denied a divorce upon her complaint and proof.

Appellant contends that the court below had no power to enter a decree for alimony under the facts of the ease as found, and that upon the findings the cross-complainant was entitled to a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hardy v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McMullin v. McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Volkmar v. VolkmarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fink v. FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCahan v. McCahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Fallon v. FallonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Goucher v. GoucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Ingraham v. IngrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API