Legal Opinion

Ingraham v. Ingraham

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 2653PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from an interlocutory decree of divorce granted by the Superior Court of Alameda County. Stanley A. Smith, Judge Presiding. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce, on the ground of willful desertion, and defendant appeals. The original complaint alleged that “defendant willfully and without cause, or provocation, deserted and abandoned plaintiff, with intent to desert said plaintiff, and ever since said time has continued to live separate and apart from plaintiff without her consent, and against her will, and with intent to desert and abandon her, and without fault of plaintiff.” An amended and supplementary complaint was filed, setting forth the ground of desertion in the same form, and adding a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hayes v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Devoe v. DevoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Mayr v. MayrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Sheridan v. SheridanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Goucher v. GoucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Lemberger v. LembergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Morris v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API