Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Puerto Rico Food Products Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 13, 1956No. 4984_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board under § 10(e) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 147, 148, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), for enforcement of an order entered by it under § 10(c) of the Act against the respondent, a Puerto Rican corporation, engaged in the business of canning local fruits and vegetables which it sells in substantial part in continental United States. All facts essential both to the Board’s jurisdiction and to ours are stipulated.
On February 15, 1953, 36 of approximately 50 employees at the respondent’s plant in Rio…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Louisville, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sharples Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- American Rubber Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Goodman Manufacturing Company, an Illinois Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Editorial "El Imparcial," Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Ruth De Pratter, Vera Mobley, Billie Traina, and Joe Diaz v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- National Labor Relations Board v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Company, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959