Legal Opinion

Dobranski v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. Docket No. 79, Calendar No. 38,614PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

By this bill in equity plaintiffs seek reformation of an automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant casualty company to Andrew Dobranski. Defendant and cross:plaintiff Dr. Dur fee has a judgment against plaintiffs arising from an automobile accident and he seeks satisfaction of his judgment under the reformed insurance policy. The relief sought was decreed in the circuit court in chancery, and the Lincoln Mutual Casualty Company has appealed. The principal question is whether Dobranski is entitled to reformation of the insurance policy. Except as otherwise indicated he will be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rorick v. State Mutual Rodded Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Coverdill v. Northern Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Shean v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pastucha v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Muskegon Lumber & Fuel Co. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. St Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. IngallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Richards v. Lowrie & Webb Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. IngallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API