Legal Opinion
United States v. Andreas
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 9, 1998No. 96 CR 0762PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MANNING, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on outstanding pre-trial motions by the government and the defendants. First, the court will address the motions related to the admissibility and use of the tape-recorded conversations regarding the alleged conspiracy to violate 15 U.S.C. § 1 by fixing the price and volume of global lysine sales.
I. The Defendants’ Motions
A. Andreas’ Motion to Exclude Inauthentic Audiotapes
Defendant Andreas now moves to exclude three categories of audiotapes which allegedly contain the defendants’ conversations at meetings held in…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Randy W. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. WhitacreDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999
- United States v. WarnerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Farmer v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Heath v. Tristar Products, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.