Duncan v. Autauga Banking & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Whatever may be the rule elsewhere, it is the settled law of this state that, to create a lien by filing for registration a certificate of judgment under the provisions of sections 7874 and 7875, Code of 1923, there must be strict observance of the requirements of the statute as to the contents of such certificate. Duncan v. Ashcraft, Admr., etc., 121 Ala. 552, 25 So. 735; Roney v. Dothan Produce Co., 217 Ala. 475, 117 So. 36; Conn v. Sellers, 198 Ala. 666, 73 So. 961; Ladd v. Smith, 209 Ala. 114, 95 So. 280; Morris v. Waldrop, 213 Ala. 435, 105 So. 172; Reuf et al. v. Fulks et al., 219 Ala.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zininam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Enslen v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Duncan v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Morris v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Conn v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ball v. VogtnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Miles v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Parker v. MauldinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Bank of Anniston v. FARMERS & MER. ST. BK.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Bowman v. SouthTrust Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.