Legal Opinion

Parker v. Mauldin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1977PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a declaratory judgment requiring the plaintiff Guy Parker to indemnify the defendants. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

The present action is based upon a former action, Parker v.Sutton, 47 Ala. App. 352, 254 So.2d 425 (1971), cert. den.287 Ala. 738, 254 So.2d 431. A review of the facts in that case will be helpful.

In 1963 Guy Parker contacted the farm implement dealer, Preuit Mauldin, a partnership, about purchasing a new high drum cotton picker but on the condition that he could sell or trade his low drum cotton picker. Robert and Coy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Vandiver & Co. v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Geer Bros., Inc. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Gulf American Fire and Casualty Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Gobble v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crigler v. SalacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Owen v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Holcim (US), Inc. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. SouthTrust Bank v. JONES, MORRISON, WOMACKCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Parker Towing Co. v. Triangle Aggregates, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API