Legal Opinion
State v. Logan
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 14, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-194406; No. 27296PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
Clarence Logan (Appellant) challenges his conviction for attempted criminal sexual misconduct in the first degree (CSC-First). Appellant argues that the trial court erred in providing the circumstantial evidence charge this Court articulated in State v. Grippon, 327 S.C. 79, 489 S.E.2d 462 (1997). According to Appellant, this charge is no longer valid in light of this Court’s decisions in State v. Bostick, 392 S.C. 134, 708 S.E.2d 774 (2011) and State v. Odems, 395 S.C. 582, 720 S.E.2d 48 (2011). We affirm Appellant’s conviction.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On May 10, 2010, the Charleston…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Robert Peter RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- State v. AdcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Hebron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. GermainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. BeatySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.