Legal Opinion

Espada 2001 v. New York City Campaign Finance Board

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

*648OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

Petitioners bring this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking a declaration that the March 9, 2006 determination by respondent New York City Campaign Finance Board, assessing penalties against them, was arbitrary and capricious. The determination assessed penalties of $61,750, jointly and severally, against petitioners for alleged violations of the New York City Campaign Finance Act (Administrative Code of City of NY § 3-701 et seq.). The penalties were purportedly assessed pursuant to Administrative Code § 3-711. The Board’s verified answer includes a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Access Capital, Inc. v. DeCiccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. New York City Campaign Finance Board v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Gross v. De BuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. State v. HollanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Figueroa v. FigueroaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API